You might assume this pattern is inherent to streaming. It isn't. The reader acquisition, the lock management, and the { value, done } protocol are all just design choices, not requirements. They are artifacts of how and when the Web streams spec was written. Async iteration exists precisely to handle sequences that arrive over time, but async iteration did not yet exist when the streams specification was written. The complexity here is pure API overhead, not fundamental necessity.
第九十条 公安机关对报案、控告、举报或者违反治安管理行为人主动投案，以及其他国家机关移送的违反治安管理案件，应当立即立案并进行调查；认为不属于违反治安管理行为的，应当告知报案人、控告人、举报人、投案人，并说明理由。
。关于这个话题，safew官方下载提供了深入分析
That's it. Any other response is either a variation of these (like "resize the buffer," which is really just deferring the choice) or domain-specific logic that doesn't belong in a general streaming primitive. Web streams currently always choose Wait by default.
Basic Plan: $27/Month