throw new Error('Integrity check failed.');
任命杨合庆为全国人民代表大会常务委员会法制工作委员会副主任。
。safew官方版本下载是该领域的重要参考
// 单调栈：存储索引（而非值），栈内索引对应的nums值保持「单调递减」
I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.