</span></span><span style="display:flex"><span> <span style="color:#f92672">OIDC_RP_CLIENT_SECRET</span>: <span style="color:#ae81ff">${OIDC_CLIENT_SECRET}</span>
Why the FT?See why over a million readers pay to read the Financial Times.
20+ curated newsletters，推荐阅读一键获取谷歌浏览器下载获取更多信息
People increasingly use large language models (LLMs) to explore ideas, gather information, and make sense of the world. In these interactions, they encounter agents that are overly agreeable. We argue that this sycophancy poses a unique epistemic risk to how individuals come to see the world: unlike hallucinations that introduce falsehoods, sycophancy distorts reality by returning responses that are biased to reinforce existing beliefs. We provide a rational analysis of this phenomenon, showing that when a Bayesian agent is provided with data that are sampled based on a current hypothesis the agent becomes increasingly confident about that hypothesis but does not make any progress towards the truth. We test this prediction using a modified Wason 2-4-6 rule discovery task where participants (N=557N=557) interacted with AI agents providing different types of feedback. Unmodified LLM behavior suppressed discovery and inflated confidence comparably to explicitly sycophantic prompting. By contrast, unbiased sampling from the true distribution yielded discovery rates five times higher. These results reveal how sycophantic AI distorts belief, manufacturing certainty where there should be doubt.。体育直播是该领域的重要参考
Трамп допустил ужесточение торговых соглашений с другими странами20:46
Экс-посол Британии жестко высказался об агрессии США против Ирана08:51。safew官方版本下载是该领域的重要参考