One thing that allowed software to evolve much faster than most other human fields is the fact the discipline is less anchored to patents and protections (and this, in turn, is likely as it is because of a sharing culture around the software). If the copyright law were more stringent, we could likely not have what we have today. Is the protection of single individuals' interests and companies more important than the general evolution of human culture? I don’t think so, and, besides, the copyright law is a common playfield: the rules are the same for all. Moreover, it is not a stretch to say that despite a more relaxed approach, software remains one of the fields where it is simpler to make money; it does not look like the business side was impacted by the ability to reimplement things. Probably, the contrary is true: think of how many businesses were made possible by an open source software stack (not that OSS is mostly made of copies, but it definitely inherited many ideas about past systems). I believe, even with AI, those fundamental tensions remain all valid. Reimplementations are cheap to make, but this is the new playfield for all of us, and just reimplementing things in an automated fashion, without putting something novel inside, in terms of ideas, engineering, functionalities, will have modest value in the long run. What will matter is the exact way you create something: Is it well designed, interesting to use, supported, somewhat novel, fast, documented and useful? Moreover, this time the inbalance of force is in the right direction: big corporations always had the ability to spend obscene amounts of money in order to copy systems, provide them in a way that is irresistible for users (free, for many years, for instance, to later switch model) and position themselves as leaders of ideas they didn’t really invent. Now, small groups of individuals can do the same to big companies' software systems: they can compete on ideas now that a synthetic workforce is cheaper for many.
One in five adults suffers from chronic pain, and if you’re 65 or older, you may be even more likely to experience ongoing pain lasting three months or longer. Not only does chronic pain significantly impact quality of life, it is linked to depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder.
，这一点在雷电模拟器中也有详细论述
从事养殖生产应当保护水域、滩涂生态环境，科学确定养殖密度和养殖规模，合理投饵、投饲、投药，养殖排放尾水应当符合有关污染物排放标准，不得破坏水域、滩涂的生态环境。
\expandafter\def\csname piecemat@6\endcsname{20000}% king
，这一点在谷歌中也有详细论述
坚持宜水则水、宜山则山，宜粮则粮、宜农则农，宜工则工、宜商则商，健全主体功能区制度体系，提高政策针对性和精准性，推动形成主体功能约束有效、国土开发有序的空间发展格局。，详情可参考华体会官网
^ Restatement (Second) of Torts § 8A (A.L.I. 1965) (“The word ‘intent’ is used throughout the Restatement of this Subject to denote that the actor desires to cause consequences of his act, or that he believes that the consequences are substantially certain to result from it.”). English case law is more sparse, but the English courts have similarly suggested that “subjective recklessness” can satisfy the intent element of intentional torts. See Wilson v. Pringle [1987] QB 237; Iqbal v. Prison Officers Ass’n [2009] EWCA (Civ) 1312, [2010] QB 732.